Entertainment News

Jay-Z Rape Accuser's Claim Is Too Old To Pursue, Lawyer Says

Monica Schipper/Phone photo

Jay-Z he tries another trick after a judge ruled that the woman who accused him cannot be named.

In accordance with Rolling Stone and deadline, rap mogul's lawyer, Alex SpiroThey filed new documents on Monday, December 30, seeking to challenge the case accusing Jay-Z of rape because the alleged assault happened a few months before the December 2000 law that provides for victims of gender-based violence began. . In December 2022, the New York City Council amended the law to allow a two-year window for people to come forward with potential historic requests to pass the statute of limitations.

“Plaintiff is unable to pursue her own claim under the Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act (the GMV Law), as a matter of law, because this law does not have retroactive effect,” Spiro wrote in his letter. Judge Analisa Torreson Deadline.

He continued, “The plaintiff alleges a violation of the GMV Act by conduct alleged to have occurred in September 2000. But the GMV Act was not enacted until December 19, 2000, three months after the FAC claims this conduct occurred, and cannot to reuse a cause of action not available to the Plaintiff at that time.”

Jay Z's Lawyer Shares New Details About Rapper's Action Against Alleged Rape System Laughter 220

Related: Jay-Z's Lawyer Presents Slideshow Denying Rape Allegations

Attorney Alex Spiro has shared new details on how his client Jay-Z has reacted to his recent rape allegations. “He's upset,” Spiro, 41, said of Jay-Z, 55, during a press conference at Roc Nation's NYC offices on Monday, Dec. 16, where Us Weekly went. “He is upset that someone will be allowed to do this, […]

In a lawsuit filed earlier this month, Jay-Z's accuser, identified only as “Jane Doe,” said she was raped by the rapper and his partner. Sean “Diddy” Combs at the MTV Video Music Awards party in 2000. He said he was 13 at the time. (Both Jay-Z and Diddy deny the allegations.)

Last week, Judge Torres said in court documents obtained by TMZ that Jane Doe could not be identified after Jay-Z's attorney filed a motion to have the case dismissed along with Doe's identity. However, the judge noted that circumstances may change as the case progresses. Torres said he intends to revisit the issue if the case continues.

2020 Diddy Sean Combs and Jay-Z Jay Z

Related: A Timeline of Jay-Z and Diddy's Perfect Friendship Amid Legal Trouble

Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs faced ups and downs while building their successful hip-hop empires. Running in the same industry circles since the '90s – when Diddy and Jay-Z launched Bad Boy Records and Roc-A-Fella Records, respectively, in New York City – the two developed a friendly rivalry as their careers of each song begins. It's over […]

Torres also accused Spiro of arguing and trying to “rush” the case, according to the release.

A lawyer Tony BuzzbeeRepresentative Doe, in a statement Us Weekly“I rarely comment on court decisions. I will say that the concerted efforts to attack me as a lawyer for the alleged victims are going down.”

Buzbee and Jay-Z are also locked in their legal battle. Jay-Z – whose real name is Shawn Carter – sued Buzbee, accusing him of fraud and defamation. Buzbee filed his lawsuit against Jay-Z's Roc Nation earlier this month, alleging that the company bribed clients to file lawsuits against his company, threatening former clients and impersonating government officials. (Roc Nation called the lawsuit “baloney.”)


Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button